Here's why: A recent study looked at its value on 392 men. They were about evenly split between conventional radiation and the new-fangled stuff. They followed the men for five years. Just over 61% of men on conventional radiation remained cancer-free. But 80.4% of those treated with high-dose radiation had no cancer recurrence, the researchers found.
This sounds great. But there's a catch. After five years, there was no difference in survival rates.
Friend, that's exactly what's wrong with conventional medicine. They get a good report on the particular parameter their chemical or procedure targets (like lowering blood pressure with drugs). But the bottom line is the long-term outcome.
Boost Your Nitric Oxide Levels With L-Arginine, Right? Wrong!
Why Arginine Is Nearly Useless For People Over 40... Plus What MIT Researchers Say You Should Be Doing Instead
Click Here To Learn More
So if you have prostate cancer (or any other cancer), don't jump on the latest technological bandwagon just because your local newspaper does. Too often there's a price to pay for jumping in too soon.
On Friday, I'll have some better, less dangerous treatments you can use to treat prostate cancer. These are treatments that work - and are quite safe.